Strategia aggiunta da trogdor
20
20
Average rating: |
4.6 |
Ratings: |
17 |
Your vote: |
|
Creator |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tags
Filter strategies:
These options reset all other sorting filters. |
||||||||||
1 | Script |
2 | 5.0 | 40 | 73
1:13
|
10 | ||||
2 | Script |
2 | 4.9 | 103 | 135
2:15
|
18 | ||||
3 |
The Enchanted Tuskling will use either Ethereal or Expunge on round 1, then use them on CD from there. If they use Expunge first this strategy will be 10 rounds. If they use Ethereal first it will be 12.
Video for Fight |
Tipo Script |
2 | 4.9 | 46 | 85
1:25
|
10-12 | |||
4 | Script |
2 | 4.6 | 20 | 84
1:24
|
11+ | ||||
5 |
Script thanks to Calipso
|
Script |
2 | 4.7 | 8 | 91
1:31
|
12+ | |||
6 | Script |
2 | 4.4 | 11 | 73
1:13
|
10-11 | ||||
7 |
Qualsiasi Livello 1+ Mascotte
|
RNG Livello 1+ Script |
2 | 4.0 | 11 | 155
2:35
|
18+ | |||
8 |
Fast and easy, enjoy :)
------------------------ Fight time: 14-15 rounds ------------------------ |
2 | 5.0 | 2 | 103
1:43
|
14-15 | ||||
9 |
Don't have all the Pirostellina di Ferro Breeds, so I could only test the more powerful ones and therefore set a Power requirement. I prefer those with less HP.
|
Tipo Script |
2 | 4.8 | 5 | 92
1:32
|
12 | |||
10 | 2 | 4.7 | 1 | 122
2:02
|
16 | |||||
11 |
Modified:
Now; 9 rounds, ~1:10 2nd pet must be Dragon |
Tipo Script |
2 | 4.5 | 0 | 80
1:20
|
10+ | |||
12 |
Had success with either a PS or PP Pirostellina di Ferro
It seems like sometimes Pirostellina di Ferro will die a round early, this doesn't change much it will just mean adding a second Terra Bruciata with Firewing, and maybe a second Artiglio Selvaggio to finish the fight |
RNG Script |
2 | 2.3 | 1 | 114
1:54
|
14+ | |||
13 | Script |
2 | 0.0 | 0 | 84
1:24
|
10-11 |
Includi Passaggi:
Abilità: 2 * *
Tipo: Qualsiasi
Tipo | Health | Power | Speed |
---|---|---|---|
HH | 1806 | 276 | 227 |
PS | 1481 | 305 | 257 |
Substitutes:
1 / 2
1 / 6
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
Pretty inflammable attitude right there
1
Devi essere registrato per votare i commenti.mraymus
scritto il 2023-11-05 20:46:19
1
Devi essere registrato per votare i commenti.Coffe#21587
scritto il 2023-07-24 15:54:27
1
Devi essere registrato per votare i commenti.Tessriel
scritto il 2023-04-01 08:41:42
This strategy can fail if Lord Flappinsby gets a crit off.(edited)2
Devi essere registrato per votare i commenti.(OP) trogdor
scritto il 2023-04-01 17:12:39
1
Devi essere registrato per votare i commenti.Gráinne
scritto il 2023-04-01 20:20:38
As a practical matter, it's a PITA to calculate the fail chance of a given strat. You can do it, but most people don't. So the site doesn't have an objective standard for what needs an RNG tag. I'm inclined to think it should depend on the difficulty of the battle.
My own mental guideline in the early days was that a normal WQ type strat definitely needs an RNG tag when its fail chance is 5% or more, and an awkward challenge-type battle, like Family, has more leeway.
But as a few people have become much more experienced and savvy about validating and testing strats, the expected standard has been raised. When I see a strat from Mutanis or DragonsAfterDark or Lazey or a handful of others, I know that any fail chance is going to be less than I'm ever likely to notice.
2
Devi essere registrato per votare i commenti.(OP) trogdor
scritto il 2023-04-15 05:51:06
Is it bad form to update this strat with a new pet after publishing? Should I make yet another strat instead? @Aranesh
2
Devi essere registrato per votare i commenti.Gráinne
scritto il 2023-04-15 12:48:17
The only downside that I see - and this is not just confined to your strat - is that when I look at the full list of strats above, I see almost the same pets in every strat, in the same pattern.
So the site isn't providing a lot of variation on this one :)
But that is not your problem, as a indivisual strat creator.
Nuovo Commento: